June 2003 Archives

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
Transvision 2003

Maria and I just arrived safely in New Haven for the World Transhumanist Association's first conference on transhumanism. Hopefully I'll be blogging the conference as events unfold. I'm looking forward to this conference as it's really the first of it's kind, and all the "leading minds" in the transhumanist arena are expected to be here.

All last week were in Manhattan, where we enjoyed great food, some great broadway shows (front row center seats for Phantom of the Opera--what a blast!), and some excellent comedy at the Comedy Works. Good times!

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
Transpetanism?

Transhumanism for pets?

Genetically modified, glow-in-the-dark pet fishes. No, this is not a test. This is for real, and you can buy them in Taiwan right now.

I should make a "Countdown to Blade Runner" website. :-) This is clearly step one, for better or for worse...

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
Lessig and RIAA face-off in PBS copyright debate

The RIAA makes some good points, but if you listen carefully you can hear contradictions. I love this quote from the RIAA spokesperson:

When you buy a CD, you should feel free to copy it for your own use. So, if you buy a CD that you keep at home, you should feel free to make a copy that you have in your car.

Good! They appear to believe in "fair use," as is promissed by the Constitution. But then why does the RIAA feel compelled to impose an "artist tax" on CDR media? (A portion of "Music CDR" goes to the RIAA). Why has the MPAA made it a federal crime to reverse-engineer and copy a DVD? ARRG!!!!!!

Some of the other RIAA comments make me very mad... In many places throughout the article they use a "victimized" tone, claiming that pirates/p2p/etc has been eroding record sales and lowering their profits. I don't buy that for a minute. Maybe, just maybe, record sales are down because (a) the recording industry has a long history of extorting radio stations into the playing the same music over and over and over again, (b) the recording industry was recently found guilty of price fixing CDs, (c) the recording industry was recently revealed to have reduced supply and variety of their artists, to lower the diversity of their offerings, so that they could sell more of a select group of recordings, (d) listener's tastes are getting more sophisticated, or (e) nobody likes boy bands anymore.

My experience through the "Internet music revolution" has been an interesting one. I finished high school right before the mp3 format started taking off an Napster came out. Like most kids, I stopped buying as much music when I was done with high school--I didn't have as much free time to listen to music and I was starting to become pretty fixed in my tastes. I think the only reason I continued to buy music at all was because of the Internet and p2p networks. I like electronic music--drum'n'bass, jungle, hi-nrg, etc. p2p networks opened up a whole new window into the electronic music scene I would have never been exposed to before. I started researching new artists, grabbing a few of their tracks online and listening to them in winamp. A few of the artists that I really liked back then I would have never discovered had it not been for Napster. Since the artists were so rare, I could never collect an entire album over Napster, so I ended up ordering the albums. I continued to buy music because of p2p. Here's the clincher: many of the artists that I was liking at that time were European, and were not represented by RIAA labels.

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
Hillary and the Whitehouse

...the Democratic candidacy in 2004 is probably a passport to the political boneyard.

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
Because we don't already kick enough ass

As if the US military is not already the most powerful and technologically sophisticated in the world, we are now developing fully-electronic battle garbs that monitor the vital signs and location of each soldier. What will these cost, $25k a piece? :-)

I guess the next step is to develop cybernetic implants for soliders, and then full-on robots to do our battles for us. These will be really useful when, ya'know, we have to fight off an alien invasion. (?!?!??)

When you sign up for the military, you basically sign all of the rights to your physical body away. The military can inject you with anything want, or perform any kind of tests they please. It's not until you get out of the military can you sue the government for mistreatment. If biological or cybernetic modification of the human soldier becomes a regular practice in the future, will advocates stand to the cause, or will the military breed a new race of human beings? :-)

Myself

Projects

Monthly Archives

Photos

About this Archive

This page is an archive of entries from June 2003 listed from newest to oldest.

May 2003 is the previous archive.

July 2003 is the next archive.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.